10 Characteristics of a Linux Guru?

Hey Ken,

You are almost spot on... but one thing that real or true GNU/Linux guru never be partial to any distro.I am presently using Gentoo(my 1st choice),openSUSE,Arch,Slackware,CentOS and Ubuntu. I have been using it for quite some time now.I found that one has to have the knack to explore and investigate what is the strength and weakness in distro and try to fix it or inform the community to fix it as soon as possible.

As you said it right that help others with you GNU/Linux knowledge is absolute must.And for haven's sake don't have any ego thing in that fellow who called herself/himself as "guru".

After spending so many years with different GNU/Linux (precisely 10 yrs) running I discover everyday something new and interesting(may be bacause of my dull head that I couldn't find it early... )

In one liner I am " Musing with GNU/Linux" and attach with it forever it seems,because I feel at home with it(as my wife knows it very well )

Cheers
Bhaskar

Thanks Bhaskar,
I think that a real Linux guru would not call himself/herself a Linux guru but I could be wrong.

I've been using Linux for over ten years and I'm definitely not a guru. And that's the thing - I don't have to be. For the last few years at least Linux has Just Worked for me and any minor issues have been quickly solved with a bit of googling. I don't use Linux because I'm a geek or an enthusiast, I use it because it's fast and reliable and I don't have to fiddle with it or maintain it. I just want to do my work and not have to be a guru..

I starting using Linux ubuntu aprox. two months ago, i don't know how much need a time to become a Linux Guru, a think a lot of time-many years.

Hey, Ken, i think you forgot characteristic #11: "His name is Linus Torvalds" :). Now there's your one and only true Linux guru!

Seriously, I've been using and helping people with GNU/Linux for around 10 years now, including pretty advanced stuff, but i could never consider myself a guru. There's a huge amount of things i still need to learn, especially low-level kernel stuff.

No people I know and would consider Guru's can do everything in your 10 rules including Linus. May I suggest that the primary might be that "you can get the job done with a minimum of false starts" and that you know where to look for the answers like most Engineering issues.

I have worked on Embedded Linux projects and many General Embedded Systems and can generally come up from a Marketing Requirement to a Design Document then execute on the Embedded design myself. I do consider myself an Embedded Systems Guru, I do not consider myself a Linux Guru. I am generally technologically agnostic and want to solve the problem in the most expedient manner that is inexpensive.

The most distressing part of it all is that marketers expect to have any Embedded Linux system out in a month. It really cannot be done. (Look at Open Pandora)

People who lecture and write books about Embedded Linux have been fired off consulting gig's because the customer expected them to not only have all the answers but they were to single handedly have the work done in a month. The customer generally cannot have their user expectations tempered by reality. Look at most forum "hate mail" for confirmation of this. KDE Forums have been rife with this kind of false user expectation.

P.S. I suspect that a rule of Guru is to be able to communicate effectively in the "lingua franca" of the group which clearly the Guru picked on did not. However on parsing the question we can see the question may be how to run with a dyndns.com account which infers "Linux Guru" was using a cable modem thus he does not have the luxury of a static IP.

The casual idea of a guru is typically associated with someone who "almost knows everything" about a system. In the case of Linux, I don't think such a person exists. The wide spectrum Linux encompasses is simply too much for any one person to know. Even Linus Torvalds is not a guru in the casual sense.

But in its precise definition, e.g. "A leader in a particular field" or "A person who counsels or advises" (as per Dictionary.com), there are plenty that fit the bill.

Linus Torvalds can be considered a guru on the intricacies and know-how on kernel development. So can Alan Cox.

Bruce Schneier can be considered a guru on cryptography, while Richard Stallman (a technical wizard in his own right) can be considered a guru on the freedoms of software usage and its many implications.

The point is, gurus in the technical sense do exist. So if someone claims they are a guru, it is likely this person is referring to a particular area of their expertise, and not in the casual sense of the word.

Very nice post.
I agree that pride is in contrast with the spirit of open source, so most of us would prefer to stay humble and not to consider ourselves special in the context of Linux community.

As far as the definition of Guru goes, I remember the phrase "an educated person is one who has learned how to learn".

one last thing, it seems to me that English is not the first language of your Guru. may be he just doesn't know what it really means, and therefore doesn't mean to set a level for himself.

11. Spends time wondering why command completion is in TOPS-20, Cisco IOS, BSD, GNU Hurd and Linux while CTRL/T for status information is in TOPS-20, Cisco IOS, BSD, GNU Hurd but not Linux. I.e. why did they keep one tradition and drop the other?