Are Cross-Platform Apps Slower Than Native? Or Is That Just a Myth in 2025? Hardware and Software Cloud-based Apps by Himadri_3 … fact, businesses love cross-platform because it helps them launch faster, maintain easier, and save costs. So… is the speed difference… Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by scope_2 Lazy loading enhances web portal speed by loading images, videos, or components only when needed. Add loading="lazy" to <img> and <iframe> tags for simple use. For advanced control, use libraries like Lozad.js or lazysizes. In frameworks like React, use React.lazy() and <Suspense>. Avoid lazy loading above-the-fold … Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by gediminas.bukauskas.7 Here is a problem: Blazor WEB application working in SSR mode performs partial update of the page after posting. JS initialization does not work in this case. It is difficult to find correct event for performing JS operations. Re: Any jQuery 4 users? Programming Web Development by Dani … much more elegant JavaScript frameworks, and native JavaScript is often faster than jQuery. Than jQuery 3, At least. I’m excited… How to speed up my (WordPress) website? Digital Media Digital Marketing by Romaric Onel Hey guys, I'm struggling to make my **website faster**, and it's driving me cra*y. 🤯 **What are your best tips to improve speed without breaking everything? Any must-have tools or tweaks? ** *I understand French! 😊* Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by Pelorus_1 By loading images and content only when necessary, lazy loading speeds up web portals. Implement JavaScript or frameworks like React with dynamic imports, and use loading="lazy" for images. Re: How to open an Excel Document in VB.NET Programming Software Development by JamesMichaelm I see it's been a while since you posted, but I'm curious if anyone here has tried using the Open XML SDK instead of Interop or OleDb for reading Excel files. I found it faster and doesn't require Excel to be installed, though it can be more complex for writing. Wondering how others handle big Excel files or ones with tricky formatting? Re: How to speed up my (WordPress) website? Digital Media Digital Marketing by Dani Use Cloudflare (free plan is available) and plugins such as WP Rocket or WP Engine. Re: How to speed up my (WordPress) website? Digital Media Digital Marketing by silverrr_btc i have currently learning html only but its so boring do all of you guys had same problem and tell me which language do i start with html, me and my friend have made a site on html with little css and and js and its going fine. can you create this? Re: How to speed up my (WordPress) website? Digital Media Digital Marketing by bijutoha I'm using WP Rocket, and I always serve my images in **AVIF** or **WebP** format. Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by gediminas.bukauskas.7 … in pages with heavy calculations only. JS performs DOM manipulations faster and requires much less resources. Consider WEB components in client… Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by Dani … our URL on the Google SERPS pages, so they load faster if a searcher clicks through to DaniWeb. This is an… python programming issue Programming by Ccrobinson001 … user installation because normal site-packages is not writeable Collecting faster-whisper==1.0.2 (from -r requirements.txt (line 1… Re: python programming issue Programming by Pebble94464 … output that you provided. Please see below. Is it correct? faster-whisper==1.0.2 groq==0.6.0 openai==1… How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by KamalDeepPareek How can lazy loading improve web portal performance by reducing initial load times and optimizing resource usage? What are the best techniques to implement lazy loading in images, components, and data fetching using JavaScript frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular? How does lazy loading impact SEO and user experience? Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by Dani Hello, The easiest way to implement image lazy loading is by simply adding the `loading="lazy"` HTML attribute to `<img>` image tags. That will not load the image until it is about to come into view in the web browser as the user scrolls down the page. Something else that we do here at DaniWeb is to use the `async` and `defer`… Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by jkon The loading="lazy" HTML attribute-value pair was introduced in 2019–2020, so I would guess it will be safe to use after 2030–2035, except if you don't care about internet visitors and are targeting an intranet of a company where you control the browsers and their versions. Of course, lazy loading impacts SEO. Modern SEO has more to do … Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by Dani > The loading="lazy" HTML attribute-value pair was introduced in 2019–2020, so I would guess it will be safe to use after 2030–2035, except if you don't care about internet visitors and are targeting an intranet of a company where you control the browsers and their versions. According to [Can I Use](https://caniuse.com/?search=… Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by jkon Dani, in my small software company (we are only five people), we have a rule for the web: support it until the problem affects less than 1 in 200 users, or 0.5%. We waited 10 years for Internet Explorer to reach this threshold, and finally, in 2025, we no longer program new web apps to support Internet Explorer. This is a liberating moment for … Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by Dani The reason why I disagree with you is because I do not see a reason to not use a performance optimization that will benefit 96% of web users, and degrade gracefully and cause absolutely no side-effects for the remaining 4%. What is the harm in using it in production *now*? I especially disagree with you because this is a performance optimization… Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by Dani > On "Can I Use," IE was supposedly "dead" in 2013 I'm not sure what you mean by that? I see it saying that IE is still in use by 0.4% of web users. It is up to *you* to determine if that is an acceptable loss. I don't think they make that determination for you because, as pointed out in my previous post, a performance … Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by jkon In reality, the usage of IE is lower than 0.4%. In some categories of web apps, it's around 0.1%, while in others, it's about 0.2%. That is why we decided to stop supporting IE from 01/01/2025. If it were above 0.5%, you shouldn’t even consider introducing something without first testing it in Internet Explorer. I can't understand how any app can … Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by Dani I think perhaps we are misunderstanding each other. Of course, it's important to not introduce any breaking functionality for any percentage of users. However, what is the harm in adding `loading="lazy"` to an existing web app? 96% of users will experience a performance improvement. The other 4% of users will have no negative … Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by jkon > However, what is the harm in adding loading="lazy" to an existing web app? 96% of users will experience a performance improvement. The other 4% of users will have no negative consequences, and everything will be exactly the same for them. That 4% will not lose any functionality. That 4% will not experience any UI/UX consequences or … Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by Dani I guess I don't understand why implementing `loading="lazy"` will hurt the CLS if you're only doing it for images below the fold, and always specifying image dimensions (which would ensure to never affect CLS at all)? Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by jkon Yes I couldn't get the CLS impact either. I understand the "speed index" SEO impact of using loading="lazy" (that in my mind make it not usable) vs using IntersectionObserver but not the CLS. I created one more test that now it looks like the the speed index impact is there , but the CLS impact is negligible (now I see a really … Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by Dani Even if using it above the fold, as long as you specify image dimensions, there should never be a CLS impact. CLS measures needing to reposition elements on the page as it loads or due to user interaction. As long as the spot for the image is carved out from the very beginning, even if the image loads much later, no other element on the page … Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by Dani Speed index should also not be affected at all by using it. Speed index measure how long it takes to load the first screen of content of a webpage. That means that if you’re using it only for content below the fold, speed index should never be affected. Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by jkon Dani as you wrote "Speed index" is supposed to be about the visible part of a web page - ATF. But because in Lighthouse I kept getting that loading="lazy" method had worse "Speed index" I created two simplified html pages for test. I gave a lot of height of what "Above the fold" is supposed to be , 940px … Re: How to Implement Lazy Loading for Faster Web Portals Programming Web Development by Dani I would like to confirm that the JS version is giving me an LCP of 0.2s and the `loading="lazy"` version is giving me an LCP of 1.1s, so certainly a huge difference there. FCP, total blocking time, CLS (0), and speed index (0.2s) scores are the same for both. I admit that, at first glance, I'm not understanding why the LCP is so long …