pseudorandom21 166 Practically a Posting Shark

I think this is a terrible event, since when is LulzSec anyone's enemy (besides the government)?

They compromised the NASA website? Why?! LulzSec exposed a CIA botnet, why would the CIA have a botnet? Isn't this botnet preying on unsuspecting users? I don't want the CIA to have a botnet, what if they decide to launch attacks on websites we use, like Daniweb?

This secrecy is against the very foundation of a free society, and remains a danger to our civil liberties, Viva La LulzSec!

MosaicFuneral commented: . +0
pseudorandom21 166 Practically a Posting Shark

//Also you shouldn't use "exit" in a C++ program, because it may cause destructors to not be called.
This probably isn't true anymore, but normally it isn't excusable to use exit() anywhere except the main function, instead you might want to throw an exception and then the caller can elect to handle it, or not (terminate the program).


"endl" does more than insert a newline, it also flushes the buffer. If you need to optimize such a trivial program, well.. There must be something unseen happening.

If you just want it to be easier to work with declare constants for array sizes and decompose it into more functions.

pseudorandom21 166 Practically a Posting Shark

Yeah, they definitely aren't up to spec with most enthusiast builds, but they are easily comparable to any computer you would find under $1k at a retail store.

Except they're made to run Mac OS and Mac OS sucks, try maximizing a window or playing Quake III on it. Better forget your hopes and dreams of eye-bleeding graphics in video games and buy the console Microsoft made for you people.

Also, lolol try maximizing a window or tell me about your file system?

jingda commented: Mac OS is mac os not Mac OSX! +0
pseudorandom21 166 Practically a Posting Shark

This morning:


Now:


So one new person cast a vote .. and 28 posts went down. Someone had a busy morning :)

I suspect if this were looked in to you would find Rashakil Fol behind it. The number of unique down voters went up by one, and my negative posts went up by 28. Someone is digging up threads just to down vote them.

Interesting...
I saw a job on oDesk that gave the details of "automating a forum task" or something..
This may only be the beginning if such is the case, of course it's very likely it is unrelated but could also be very related.
:scared:

Nick Evan commented: This thread was dead for two years. +0
pseudorandom21 166 Practically a Posting Shark

Yeah you should post in the C# forum because C++/CLI uses .NET
People like "Moschops" don't even know what C++/CLI is.

pseudorandom21 166 Practically a Posting Shark

Yes, I completely agree now. You are not worth my time. You do not listen to what other people say, and when someone does not agree with you, you try to desperately defend your own opinion by insulting others.

That is a lie, my interest in this thread just dropped to about zero when I noticed the flock of naysayers were about to drag this thread on for.foorking.ever.

pseudorandom21 166 Practically a Posting Shark

Are you done insulting other people without an apparent reason? If you are, then I may discuss with you this subject further. If you do not have anything intelligent to say, then I am done here.

It's just that the flock of naysayers aren't worth the time.

pseudorandom21 166 Practically a Posting Shark

Well, I personally use Linux :)
The link you posted does not account the servers Linux, TVs, new refrigerators, PS3s, Microprocessors, cars and planes, super computers, Phones, and Tablet PCs. No-one misinterprets you, but we are just telling you there is things other then Windows.

Windows (as OS) and .NET are written in C++ and C, this functions you used are written in C++ lower-level API and just called from C#. So nothing can be made without C++. Some of the devices that use C and C++ don't even have screens, so how would the implement the screen-shots? You should care for all the programmers, not only about yourself, and this is what Dennis Ritchie and Bjarn Stroustrup did!

Sounds like more butthurt babbling because you don't want to hear that .NET is better for business.

GrimJack commented: Why must you stoop to name-calling, a little defensive? +0
jwenting commented: ad-hominem attacks instead of arguments... +0
pseudorandom21 166 Practically a Posting Shark

hello
i wanna build software that i will be can speak with my friend with our cams
i have used that dll : WebCam_Capture
and that only show my camera . but i cant show my friend camera/ how can i do it?<<<
thankss

That is the most unimaginative thing I've heard in quite a while.

pseudorandom21 166 Practically a Posting Shark

i dont know how, thats why i'm asking for help.. and i cant find any prime number program in google that uses while loop but doesnt use bool.

Well anything we would write for you would be using modern, standard C++ instead of your 30 year old outdated non-standard C++ that you compile with Borland Turbo C++. So you can see the problem with us writing a program for you every time you're too lazy to use a search engine to learn something.

Yeah, and in place of the bool use an integer, use the value "0" for false and "1" for true. Enjoy your wasted programming "skills".

HASHMI007 commented: wtf +0
pseudorandom21 166 Practically a Posting Shark

I'm probably going to vote for Ron Paul, and join his political party, and put up flyers.

pseudorandom21 166 Practically a Posting Shark

Hello, I'm considering serialization as a means of creating a simple database for an application. I'm wondering if I'm going to run into any problems trying to serialize a list of a record-style struct comprised of simple data types, like strings and int, maybe a a DateTime or two.

so.. I have something like:

struct foo{
string x, y;
int z;
DateTime theTime;
}

List<foo> fooList;//<-- need to serialize

Also, is there any way to know how many foos are serialized to a file?

pseudorandom21 166 Practically a Posting Shark

hmm.. I'm not sure but *[] may be treated as a multi-dimensional array, in which case the compiler would also need to know the size of the second (and every successive) dimension.

pseudorandom21 166 Practically a Posting Shark

Never mind this post.

pseudorandom21 166 Practically a Posting Shark

1. int a[ ][ ] ={{2,3},{3,4},{4,5}};
i. It will create a 3*2 matrix and initialize it
1. 2.
1. [ [2][3] ] //<-- one way to think about it.
2. [ [3][4] ] //3 x 2
3. [ [4][5] ]