Hello,
I have a little question.
Lets say I have string:
string g="ZOMGGGG";
and a Boolean var:
bool S;
so in C# if I write S=g.contains("GGGG");
and I get true if it contains else false.
How do I use that in JavaScript?
Thank You!
JC
Hello,
I have a little question.
Lets say I have string:
string g="ZOMGGGG";
and a Boolean var:
bool S;
so in C# if I write S=g.contains("GGGG");
and I get true if it contains else false.
How do I use that in JavaScript?
Thank You!
JC
you cant directly as they are two seperate languages. you could output content to the page using a script block somthign like the following
string g = "ZOMGGGG";
bool s = g.contains("GGGG");
Response.Write("<script type=\"text/javascript\">alert('" + s + "');</script>");
I mean in a form that i make in Html, i need to check that the user name name value doesn't contain the first name of the person.
so what You wrote instead of the 3rd line(replacing by) I can write return s; ? It's in a function...
so the ".contains" works on javascript?
awesome!
thanks :D
I mean in a form that i make in Html, i need to check that the user name name value doesn't contain the first name of the person.
so what You wrote instead of the 3rd line(replacing by) I can write return s; ? It's in a function...
so the ".contains" works on javascript?
awesome!
thanks :D
i think you mis interpreted my response then to check if a string contains a string in javascript you want the following.
function stringContains(string, value) {
// To make this case insensitive comment out the following 2 lines
// string = string.toLowerCase();
// value = value.toLowerCase();
return string.indexOf(value);
}
// Then call it with the following
var g = 'ZOMGGGG';
var s = stringContains(g, 'GGGG');
Bumping cause I couldn't get it to work, The function should return -1 if it doesn't contain the string right?
this is what I've done:
function string_contains(string,value)
{ string=string.toLowerCase();
value=value.toLowerCase();
return string.indexOf(value);
}
if (string_contains(theform.pass.value,theform.first_n.value)!=-1)
{
theform.pass.focus();
theform.pass.select();
newalert(iderror16);
return (false);
}
what's wrong?
cant i send the first_n as a value??
Hi JooClops,
With this version you can choose whether the test is case-sensitive or case-insensitive and it also returns a proper boolean (not -1 | index):
<script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript">
//old English expression: "It's like trying to find a needle in a haystack"
function string_contains(haystack, needle, caseInsensitive){
if(needle.toString() === '') {
return false;
}
if(!caseInsensitive) {
return haystack.toString().indexOf(needle.toString()) >= 0;
}
else {
return haystack.toString().toLowerCase().indexOf(needle.toString().toLowerCase()) >= 0;
}
}
alert( string_contains('ABCDEF', 'N') );//false
alert( string_contains('ABCDEF', 'B') );//true
alert( string_contains('ABCDEF', 'b') );//false
alert( string_contains('ABCDEF', 'b', true) );//true
alert( string_contains('ABCDEF', '') );//false
</script>
caseInsensitive
defaults to false (ie case-sensitive) if omitted. if(needle.toString() === '') { return false; }
ensures that an empty string does not test positive (which would otherwise be the case). toString()
guards against errors if non -strings are passed in.
I can't see why theform.first_n.value
should not work as along as theform.first_n
exists (and is within scope).
Airshow
Something strange here. I successfully edited my post above then it reverted to unedited version without a refresh or anything BUT the edited version appeared again on qoting it! That's not good behaviour. I will report is as a bug.
This is my edited version. If it is identical to the post above, then please don't blame me - it's the site software.
With this version you can choose whether the test is case-sensitive or case-insensitive and it also returns a proper boolean (not -1 | index):
<script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript">
//old English expression: "It's like trying to find a needle in a haystack"
function string_contains(haystack, needle, caseInsensitive){
if(needle.toString() === '') {
return false;
}
if(!caseInsensitive) {
return haystack.toString().indexOf(needle.toString()) >= 0;
}
else {
return haystack.toString().toLowerCase().indexOf(needle.toString().toLowerCase()) >= 0;
}
}
alert( string_contains('ABCDEF', 'N') );//false
alert( string_contains('ABCDEF', 'B') );//true
alert( string_contains('ABCDEF', 'b') );//false
alert( string_contains('ABCDEF', 'b', true) );//true
alert( string_contains('ABCDEF', '') );//false
</script>
caseInsensitive
defaults to false (ie case-sensitive) if omitted. if(needle.toString() === '') { return false; }
ensures that an empty string does not test positive (which would otherwise be the case). toString()
guards against errors if non -strings are passed in.
I can't see why theform.first_n.value
should not work as along as theform.first_n
exists (and is within scope).
Airshow
Awesome, it works :P
thanks Airshow!
btw ""It's like trying to find a needle in a haystack"
I know this expression :)
thx again.
JC
We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.