Posts by canadafred

Completely off-topic but the Harper era has come to pass. Seems to me that the Liberals under Justin Trudeau are poising to take the next two/three elections. This will be good for Canada and less good for the American interests in Canada.

shaw was not implicated as cooperating with NSA

The Chinese government is just as interested in Tibet's oil as the US oil industry. The only difference is that corporations likes Chevron and Exxon want ALL the world's oil reserves in the same way that mineral extraction corporations want ALL of the diamonds, silenium, gold, copper, zinc ... In looking back over recent history (last 50 years), the US backed multi-national corporations will stop at nothing despite the human cost to secure future profits for their shareholders. I think that is the point I'm trying to make. Ironically, ridding the world of the bad guys with their 1% attitude rooted in the name of God, then for the good of the country amd always for the betterment of civilized society of course.

As it appears to me that the multi-national corporations wanted to pillage the Orient are positioning themselves with US policy backing them, I suppose the next target for US foreign policy is to incite enough turmoil in Tibet (perhaps similar to how they played a role in Egypt) so as to piss off the Chinese government enough to retaliate "against Tibetans" in order to restore the tranquility Tibetans are incidentally presently enjoying.

It's unfortunate for the rest of the world but the war on terrorism that americans are actively engaged in will be the world's last war, as it has no way of ever ending. Terrorism will evolve. Luckily, the US happens to be in the business of war so this final war is very good for the US economy (the hell with mankind in general).

Try to remember that the US government is perpetrating crimes against other countries too. Personally I'm pissed at US corporations such as Microsoft, Apple, Google .. who barder my secrets to spy agencies in an effort to save their own skin from prosecution from the US, It's all so freakin retarded.

The sub-domain needs to be found. Linking to it will get it indexed and ranked.

Search engine results pages deliver qualified traffic to web pages of all Green PR values including PR0; with the exception of grey I think, as grey does indicate a negative PR value. The point about PR value ... oh ya ... it's fanatically over estimated to be the elixir of all ranking woes.

Hurry up! Go get some PR.

Fetch some find some just get it.

Content is good. Yes content is good. Yippee for content.

Think about this ... A PR0 web page can kick the snot out of a PR6 competing for the same keyphrases. This phenomena occurs in search engine results and can often have little to do with the degree of green link puke (Google PageRank) that is associated with the web page.

Just a thought.

You can go now. Get back to PR pumping up your pages now .. pm me how you make out with that ... yep ... you know it

Keyword density is generally considered the number of times a word appears on a web page divided by the total number of words (minus stop words) on the web page. The words can appear in paragraphs, captions, links, lists or headings.

How about creating a web page worth linking to rather than scrambling to make a web page appear to be important by artificially increasing its incoming links. Create something worthy of links rather than creating the illusion that something is worthy because of its links. See the reasoning there? Make important, unique new content. Forget about manipulating the search engine.

How i can check "be specific and check the attributes."

Check the HTML tag for the link in the web page's source coding and if it has the rel="nofollow" attribute then it is a nofollow link.

ie: <a href="http://www.yoursite.com" rel="nofollow">Your Site</a>

Once upon a time, there lived a happy little link. It was all comfortable 'n cuddly 'n stuff and it felt real important because some nice webmaster included it in his meaningful content.

Then came PageRank technology and the links went nuts or the nuts went linking, I don't remember which.

Forum postings, yes. Those are good places. Yep.

1,000 directories so far! WOW! How long did that take you?

Hello
What is main technic of Black hat SEO....
Please tell Black hat SEO process..

There are many techniques that can be considered Black Hat SEO.

The most common types in today's Internet marketing world revolve around manipulating link popularity (and link relevance); essentially most link building strategies can be unethical. Theoretically, any form of artificially inflating the number of backlinks to a web page falls within the range of Grey Hat to Black Hat search engine optimisation. For example, normal link exchanges is considered Grey Hat but excessively exchanging links moves up the spectrum to Black.

I doubt these calls are originating from Google. Probably scammers.

Let me see if I have my history right.

The Open Directory was created a long, long time ago, with the intention to essentially to be a leading search engine on its own merit. Instead of hiring editors to maintain the database they use "volunteers" that approve listings, edit titles and descriptiones etc. This "open" system worked well for a while and everyone was super horny to get a good ranking from the ODP.

The Open Directory evolved into DMOZ a few years later and ultimately was taken over by Google to act as a sort of Directory option in search, similar to Yahoo. Well, this concept didn't work out very well at all because of the amount of control the "volunteer editors" had over positioning one web site better than another. Because of the human influence on search results, the project became corrupted. Rumours were circulating that "ODP editors" were accepting bribes by eager web site owners (especially in competitive keyphrase arenas) and ultimately some of these cases were proven. DMOZ (the old ODP) lost a bunch of credibility but Google stuck with it and put it on the back burner; but never has fully disengaged it.

Nowadays the ODP is a big joke, a big fat useless joke that somehow survives, who knows how and who knows why.

I would think that because you redirect page1 to page2 the search engine will include it in a crawl despite a robot.txt instruction to do otherwise.

I would set specific keyphrase goals, analyze the competition then develop an SEO plan and timelime.

Another way is to divide your ideas into two lists: on-site optimization and off-site optimization and then set about accomplishing manageable tasks one at a time.

... forget about the fancy tools. Where does the web page rank for the keyphrase? That is the guidepost to how well the page is doing.

Having multiple web sites performing separate functions is a good idea. Make sure that you cross-link them in a way that gels the relevance and highlights the important web pages (most likely the various landing pages).

You can use the same addresses and phone numbers, try to present them uniquely and position them in different places ie: on one web site put it in the header, another the footer, sidebar menu ... The search engine understands that often it requires more than one web site to deliver information logically.

Your web sites would work better if they each had their own unique architectecture (coding and layout mostly but navigation system too). Create some in a blog format to facilitate variation.

It is not wise to use the same copy (paragraphs) across multiuple web pages. The search engine will deem one more authentic than the others but award little value to the duplicates.

If the product description is supplied by the manufacturer chances are that it is already somewhere on the web. Take the time to rewrite generic content that you cannot avoid using to describe your products.

No need to have an search engine optimisation brain bursting ... there tons of on-site searchengine optimization techniques to try out; such things as naturally emphasizing keyphrases by using them sparingly in headings, supporting them rather than repeat them in the content with word variables (altering prefixes or pluralizing for example), give an intelligent appearance by having synonymous keyphrases present in the content, abbreviations, acronyms, antonyms, morphologies ... Try keeping your spelling and grammar clean but keep writing and supporting, emphasizing naturally ... look at your logical naming conventions for web pages and images, work your attributes whenever helpful ... freshen up things ... tighten up anchors ...

... which blog is better i.e. blogspot, bloggers, wordpress or we should install blog on our server ...

It's hard to know what combination of blogging software/platform would be best for your needs as successful SEO for blogging varies considerably.

Sometimes specific keyphrase markets influence method effectiveness; but using your limited variables, I'd say that you'd be better off with your own domain using a blogger or wordpress or practically any other CMS (content management system).

You don't need the -in- part as "in" is a stop word and has no value SEO-wise. The search engine will ignore it and it takes up character spaces unnecessarily.

Older domain names, provided they haven't been overly spammed out, have already established a certain degree of authenticity and credibility with the search engine. After a content overhaul they wouldn't normally require any probationary period to ascertain rank.

... and as the serach engine results pages offer video and news results, they too fall into the "broader term" cscgal refers to, I think.

Aside with what has already been pointed out, you may consider evaluating the differences between and the pros and cons of the various ways websites can be optimized for the search engines. I suggest you go to wikipedia for the most accepted definition of white hat seo (search engine optimisation), grey hat seo and black hat seo. What your link exchanging qualifies is under grey hat seo. Your SERP (search engine results pages) situation can be rectified rapidily and decisively with the implementation of a sound, evolving search engine marketing strategy.

Then read the search engine's own quality content guidelines and away you go to long lasting sutainable search engine results, even in the most competitive keyphrase environments.

Hi, I have two available names for my site. One is a dot com and the other is a dot me. My question is did dot me catch on? Anyone know any reason not to use dot me besides dot com is more popular and comes to most peoples minds? The .me is appropriate for the site but will that hurt the chances of people finding it. Any comments or experiences with dot me would be great.
Thanx.

Search engines usually consider a dot com TLD more legitimate than .info, .biz, .net, etc. and award some additional value to the webpages within. If I am not mistaken, the .me extension is a country specific one being often used for purposes beyond regional usage and would fall within the same "spammed out" pool of extensions originally intended to be country specific but exploited by Internet marketers globally (like the .tv, .it, .cc etc.). Having a web site hosted in a country another than where the extension derives (ie a .ca TLD hosted in India) would raise red flags for the search engines, especially if the extension is already well known to be playgrounds for spammers (or any purpose other than what the extension was originally created to identify).

Everybody can add their fanpage here: www facebook com/addmyfanpage

Now that's a great way to solve this thread. Somebody want to declare this thread solved?

Whether websites with '.com' are given more prominence by Google, from SEO perspective than the websites with suffixes, viz., '.info', '.net' and '.us'.

I seldom find a .info in the first page of search results. An info web site's content has got to be something pretty special in order to overcome the prejudice the search engines has for the extension. Dot info spammers long ago lost favour with the search engines.

A dot us domain, under certain circumstances, could be advantageous for regional search.

I consider a .net slightly disadvantaged over the dot com. Although a .net can easily be made into a decent SERP (search engine results pages) performer.

I am not sure what's a dot viz so I'll go away now.

It depends. If you want to try your hand at SEO then, because it would be free, it would be better and long lasting (if done correctly). A PPC campaign could be your solution too but it will cost you money and whenever you decide to stop the campaign so stops your web presence in the search engine results pages.

Hiring a search engine optimizer I would think would not usually be a great experience for innocent, vulnerable website owners because there seems to be many SEOs around lately who actually have no SEO skills at all however insane that sounds.

Can anybody explain me how ppc works?:)

I'm no PPC expert but essentially you pay to have ads put in the sponsored listings located on the search engine results pages. Actually, you only pay when a searcher clicks your ad and arrives at your web sites, theoretically. Now, this is a basic definition but that's about it.

Gigablast? What the hell is that?

link:url will do for the major SEs. Gigablast? I can't belive you mentionned that dinosaur. What do they get, less than .05% of web search traffic. Wake up! It's Google, then MSN (Bing,Live) and Yahoo in about that order. Get with the program.

If the search engine is telling you that you are sending an automated query, then theoctically you are then presenting an automated query. Consider sending it something more generitic. Becoming innovative is requested.

It's really hard to believe that anyone who writes as poorly as you do can perform anything remotely resembling search engine optimization.

I noticed on your web site that you have an off-shore office, in India. Are you sure it's not the other way around and you have an off-shore office in New Jersey?

Learn to write properly.

Thank you for reply , i can understand that a lots mistake here can you suggest me Description and Tittle for home page so i can learn how to design title and description , i do all this by reading books and seen some of website Please help me out.

I don't know if you're familiar with the ancient Chinese proverb: "You can give a man a fish or you could teach him how to fish." As you may be a PHP developer (and you should capitalize php to be PHP) I am going to assume that you have at least some intelligence and basic computer skills.

Here's my advice for you.
1. Learn how to better express yourself in English. This is incredibly important for writing effective Titles and Descriptions or almost any other aspect of SEO (on-site optimization).
2. After you have become skilled at expressing yourself in English, take a creative writing course to hone in on your ability to craft unique textual content; content rich in creativity, innovativeness and in such a way that is compelling to read. Good content is OK but exceptional content will facilitate your web pages ranking amongst the top players in the vast majority of keyphrase races.
3. As you seem to be doing, stay concentrated on learning and practicing the search engine optimization skills that deal with the basic optimizable webpage components Ithe on-site ranking factors).

Good luck.

Your question I think was mainly about examining the Title and Description.

The Title is way too long. Keywords repeated way too often. Is boring as heck, doesn't capture the imagination of the web searcher and indian should be Indian.

Write a short interesting Title and use keyphrases once, maybe, maybe, maybe twice.

The Description is basically the same. Boring. Repetitive. Nonsensial because of the sentence fragments.

Write two short descriptive capturing sentence with one or two instance of keyphrases.