deceptikon

> `feof(stdin)` can be used to check if the input was read from the file or keyboard. No, not really. It's not uncommon to signal end-of-file from the keyboard. For example, run the following program and watch it print "Yes" when you signal end-of-file using ctrl+z (Windows) or ctrl+d (POSIX): …

> All of you includes are depreciated. Deprecated, not depreciated. Also, since <iostream.h> and <conio.h> were never standard in the first place, they cannot be deprecated. They're just non-standard.

The error tells you what line it happens on, so take a look at that code, the contents of the assertion, and correct the bug. You didn't include any useful information, so I can't help more than that.

What kind of barcode? Are you working with an image or text? Are you actually creating a barcode or reading one? Your question is incredibly vague.

I'll be committing a fix for this display bug shortly. Pending Dani's approval it should be resolved in the next push to production.

Does the device already have a driver or is he expected to write one?

I assume by "booming" you mean popularity. In what context are we talking about? There are a lot of different places programming languages are used in very different ways, and a number of variables could affect which language is "booming" in a certain area and for certain people.

> `noOfRows = da.Fill(ds, "tblCustomers");` > No value given for one or more required parameters. [Documentation](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.data.common.dataadapter.fill.aspx) is amazing. There's no overload that takes just a DataSet and a string.

I'm hesitant to help you now that I know your intention for learning assembly is hacking.

Well, for starters I wouldn't use the TextChanged event because that would result in a lot of hits on the database for intermediate text. For example, if the user types "foobar", you'd go back and do a fuzzy lookup on the database *six times* when you really only wanted *one* …

Wildcards are interpreted by the shell before your program gets a chance to touch them. If you want them passed as literals, then escape them so that they're not interpreted as wildcards: $ python ./arch.py install \*

> There is no pass by value when it comes to a function with array as the parameter. It's the other way around. There's no pass by reference in C, period. When passing an array, you're passing the address as a pointer *by value*.

Sorry, we don't allow discussion of hacking on Daniweb.

> `define('DB_NAME', 'lol);` Count the single quotes in that line.

> You should use <iostream> and <cmath> (all C++ standard headers don't have the .h, and all those taken from C (like math.h, stdlib.h, stdio.h, etc.) also omit the .h and are prefixed with the letter c). It's also important to remember that some compilers (Microsoft's in particular) "helpfully" don't …

> With three programming courses under my belt will I be able to find a job out there in the real world? Getting a programming job has less to do with how much you know about programming and more to do with selling yourself. So while I'd say that right …

At its simplest you'd have something like this just to store the characters: #include <stdio.h> #define EXPR_MAX 255 int main(void) { FILE *in = fopen("c:\\test1.txt", "r"); if (in) { char expr[EXPR_MAX]; size_t n = 0; int ch; while ((ch = getc(in)) != EOF) { expr[n++] = (char)ch; } fclose(in); /* …

So...is your question how to turn these classes into templates?

Using the initializer list you can take advantage of initialization rules: #include <iostream> using namespace std; struct a { double id; int tag; char array[10]; }; int main() { a var1 = {100, 1, "The City"}; a var2 = var1; cout << "var2.id = " << var2.id << endl; cout …

> But can you tell me why in the definition of f1 (in your code) p's address has not been passed and still it's passed by reference? The entire point of using another level of indirection is so that you can access the original object. If you already have that …

[Read the documentation](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa376868(v=vs.85).aspx), it includes [an example](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa376871(v=vs.85).aspx).

So you're supposed to do this project, but you're asking for someone to send it to you? I'm sorry, but that sounds a lot like you're asking others to do your project for you.

Assuming the time part of your date is consistent (such as midnight), it's a simple check against getdate(): "select * from usernames where [Username] = '" & TextBox2.Text & "' and [Password] = '" & TextBox1.Text & "' and [ExpiresOn] >= getdate()" You might also consider using parameterized queries instead …

> Yes, it is possible but it is not recommended. Why? > It is better to have dynamically allocated array in this case. Again, why? Please assume that the compiler supports C99, since the obvious "it's not portable" prior to C99 is obvious. > `int *array = malloc(i*sizeof(int)); // alloc …

According to [the manual](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/70x4wcx1.aspx) WriteLine() returns void, you can't assign that to `answer[i]`.

I assume you're asking about the ternary operator. This: 'left': (direction === 0) ? '-100%' : '100%' Is roughly equivalent to this: if (direction === 0) { 'left': '-100%'; } else { 'left': '100%'; } So it's just a expressionized version of an if..else statement.

`continue` is a keyword in C++. Use a different name.

> What I don't understand is, would a real world program have a default constructor AND a constructor with parameters? Certainly, if there's a case where the class could initialize itself to a predictable state without help from the caller. One example might be an empty string, so std::string has …

[How would you do it on paper?](http://www.wikihow.com/Convert-from-Decimal-to-Binary) The first task is to understand the problem and solve it manually, step by step. Then you'll be in a better position to translate those steps into C++.

> I would appreciate it if someone can put more detailed comments in this source code to help me better understand it. Sorry, but no. There won't always be someone around who's both capable and *willing* to read, understand, and recomment large amounts of code just to make things easier …