I just saw someone's program that assigned string this way:
string x("snow");
It seems to work, as I could display the output x as "snow". Is this a legible way to assign strings? How does it differ from
string x="snow";
?
I just saw someone's program that assigned string this way:
string x("snow");
It seems to work, as I could display the output x as "snow". Is this a legible way to assign strings? How does it differ from
string x="snow";
?
Different generating style
1..call the generator
2..make a temp string object first,and the copy it to the left variable.
Haha, is it right?
They are roughly equivalent statements. You can do it with the standard data types too.
//both these statements are valid:
int myInt(15); //constructor version
int myInt = 15; //assignment version
For the standard datatypes, there really isn't any performance penalty for doing it via the assignment version. When you start to get more deeply into objects/classes then it becomes more of an issue and you're better off with the constructor version.
We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.