y c++ is not fully oops
tiyagu_vpm 0 Newbie Poster
krnekhelesh 16 Junior Poster
Please read the rules before posting. You are not allowed to use short forms while posting.
~s.o.s~ 2,560 Failure as a human Team Colleague Featured Poster
> y c++ is not fully oops
Because it was meant as a OO replacement for C programmers. Also not everything is an object in C++. In pure OO languages, even a class in an object and everything which happens, happens due to message passing between objects. Smalltalk is a pure OO language.
iamthwee
>y c++ is not fully oops
You are initially correct in your assumption.
"[c++]...is one of the most successful conspiracies hatched/practical jokes ever played on nerds who take ideas like OOP seriously"
Narue 5,707 Bad Cop Team Colleague
>y c++ is not fully oops
Because the creator didn't want to restrict C++ users like that.
jbennet 1,618 Most Valuable Poster Team Colleague Featured Poster
mmm C# and Java (based loosely on C) are much more OO but even they are not 100% truly OO
jwenting 1,889 duckman Team Colleague
anyone who cares one way or another has no business being in professional software development...
Be a part of the DaniWeb community
We're a friendly, industry-focused community of developers, IT pros, digital marketers, and technology enthusiasts meeting, networking, learning, and sharing knowledge.