Timestamp | Post | Voter | Comment | Reputation |
---|---|---|---|---|
Re: Making a table column auto-resize | 454SFDS | UR R WORSTR | -0 | |
Re: Hover state of menu links is offset | jonsan32 | The style sheet is linked in the code: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5739741/OMAR/code/megamenu_files/HTML/css/megamenu.css | +2 | |
Re: Why does Windows XP refuse to die? | Tcll | more than likely, knowing them | +4 | |
Re: Why does Windows XP refuse to die? | Tcll | no surprize there. | +4 | |
Re: Why does Windows XP refuse to die? | Tcll | *applauds* +1 :) | +4 | |
Re: Why does Windows XP refuse to die? | Tcll | love it! | +3 | |
Re: Three-quarters of organisations still run XP, 64% expect to be attacked | Tcll | fully agreed, they should rather work on cleaning up support with updates, support both WinAPI AND Aero to it's fullest, and knock out issues where possible. | +3 | |
Re: Three-quarters of organisations still run XP, 64% expect to be attacked | Tcll | it's that stupid high-resource Aero interface MS wants to use to control everyone. | +3 | |
Re: Three-quarters of organisations still run XP, 64% expect to be attacked | hithirdwavedust | I can see how this would be really obnoxious. Here's how to do it in the future: Use your 'replacement computers as 'stand-ins' so that every few months a computer that has been working fine can be swapped out for cleaning, maintenance and diagnostics. | +0 | |
Re: Three-quarters of organisations still run XP, 64% expect to be attacked | hithirdwavedust | Supporting all OSs for 20 years would merely devolve said OS to an overly contankerous, mind-bogglingly bloated wad of rubbish while hindering pertinent new innovation. | -0 | |
Re: Why does Windows XP refuse to die? | Tcll | fully agreed and compared with my own experiences | +2 | |
Re: Why does Windows XP refuse to die? | Tcll | well said mate :) | +2 | |
Re: Why does Windows XP refuse to die? | Everyauction | agree | +2 | |
Re: A Simple HTML Login page using JavaScript | F-3000 | A point I should have mentioned in my reply. | +0 | |
Re: how to convert ordinary images into vector in photoshop? | YousefAB | Don't be close minded! | -1 | |
Re: tableless css based page displays ok in IE7 not in IE6 | sandra21 | very usefull info | +1 | |
Re: Checklist for CSS problems | ggeoff | Excellent contribution! | +2 | |
Re: tables vs divs & workflow advice? And a list for CSS workarounds for browsers? | iamthwee | excellent +1 | +22 | |
Re: HTML Tables vs CSS & divs - examples/help | FeralReason | Answers the "why" part of my question ! | +1 | |
Re: Need help with clientWidth/Height issue | oakleymk | I do appreciate your coments :) | +1 | |
Re: Bottom border missing - Word 97 | tez | Great help. Brilliant, clear solution. | +6 | |
Re: Suggestion for new field in the public profile page | Ancient Dragon | LOL | +36 | |
Re: Somewhat-proper sentence enforcement checker thingy. | Ancient Dragon | Exactly :) | +36 | |
Re: Somewhat-proper sentence enforcement checker thingy. | nav33n | echo! | +11 | |
Re: Voting on your own snippets. | Comatose | :) | +12 | |
Re: Voting on your own snippets. | iamthwee | funny | +18 | |
A reason to use tables instead of divs | iamthwee | Nice take/points. | +18 | |
Re: Content Boxes | Erek4 | Good tip | +1 | |
Re: Is there an easier way? =P | iamthwee | yes | +18 | |
Can't find my old post | Salem | I feel your pain :( | +27 |
The End.