khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

Red Hat Enterprise Linux now comes with built-in virtualization (KVM) but is Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization (RHEV) about to go to the virtual mat with VMware? If you look at their RHEL video, you'll come away with a resounding 'Yes' to that question.

Red Hat purchased Qumranet in 2008 to acquire their KVM-based virtualization solution and SolidICE product based on the SPICE protocol.

What does RHEL mean for consumers?

For the end user, folks like you and me, it means that hosting companies can offer more services to developer and companies that host their applications at third-party locations, which in turn means richer applications and experiences. It also means lower costs because adopters can implement Red Hat's enterprise virtualization solution without the high upfront costs associated with established virtualization technologies.

What does RHEL mean for corporate adopters?

Smart CIOs will see the writing on the wall and engage Red Hat's virtualization team to migrate their physical servers to virtual ones. Lower and predictable costs are just two of RHEL's advantages over other Linux-based virtualization solutions. KVM is a full virtualization solution, like VMware or Citrix, but has the distinct advantage of the super fast SPICE protocol.

The primary question remains, "Is Red Hat the new VMware?" There's a good chance that it is. Red Hat dominates the commercial Linux market and that fact places it in a strategic position to launch itself …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

In a twist of Internet fate, Facebook creator and owner Mark Zuckerberg finds himself as defendant in a lawsuit over the Facebook's majority ownership. Paul Ceglia claims that he entered into a contract, signed by both himself and Zuckerberg, that sold 50 percent of facebook.com to Ceglia for $1,000. Ceglia further claims that Zuckerberg promised him one percent more per day until the site was completed. Ceglia filed his claims with the Allegany County Supreme Court of New York. He claims to own 84 percent of Facebook per the contract.

I wonder if Ceglia would be so interested in the lawsuit or his claim if Facebook had failed? I also wonder if Ceglia updated his Facebook page with this claim?

Why didn't Ceglia come forward before now? Facebook as operated online since 2004. Did Ceglia just run across the "contract" while rifling through some old papers or did the contract skip his mind until now?

The relief sought in the suit is:

Declaratory judgement for monetary damages and 84% ownership.

So, what would Zuckerberg be left with? He is the "face" of Facebook. He's the guy who created it, nurtured it and grew it into something. Where was Ceglia when all this growth was going on? Why didn't he want his 84% then? If Zuckerberg had been really smart, he would have sold out when he was offered $1 billion and retired at a very young age.

In …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

In the latest episode of the story that never ends, SCO filed an appeal in the closed case against Novell. Everyone in the Linux and Open Source Communities thought the case was finally brought to a close when the judge declared that Novell is the owner of UNIX copyrights. The judge also ordered the case closed. However, SCO has decided to appeal the ruling and has asked for a reconsideration of all decisions. It's anyone's guess as to how SCO continues to stoke these court fires while in bankruptcy and a rapidly dwindling customer base.

IBM, Novell and others who've been sued by SCO for violating their nonexistent copyright to UNIX have dealt with this travesty for seven years, when SCO originally sued IBM in 2003.

Still in a state of denial on the court's ruling, SCO sports the following on their Company Profile page:

The SCO Group (Pink Sheets: SCOXQ) is a leading provider of software technology for distributed, embedded, network-based systems, offering SCO OpenServer for small- to medium-sized businesses and UnixWare for enterprise solutions.

SCO's highly innovative and reliable solutions help millions of customers grow their businesses everyday, from SCO OpenServer on Main Street to UnixWare on Wall Street.

SCO owns all rights and ownership of the core UNIX operating system source code originally developed by AT&T/Bell Labs. SCO’s ownership includes system source code, including all versions and copies, SCO OpenServer, and certain copyrights and source code …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

@TechWriter10

Yeah, that's what I was getting at. Someone always gets hurt. Layoffs hurt. But you're right, it doesn't have to hurt everyone.

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

According to the Associated Press article, "Tech customers question industry's takeover spree," large technical companies have absorbed smaller tech companies to the detriment of their customers although these tech "sponges" say they're doing it "for their customers." How can there be such a disparity between the reality of customer pain and the public face of the tech companies? But why would a customer complain about their favorite tech company getting soaked up by a larger, better funded company? In a single word: Delivery.

Delivery is how efficiently customers are served by a provider. And, it's a major pain point for technology consumers. Large companies have such a complex and multilayer delivery engine that they fail to respond quickly to customer's needs.
Larger companies fail where smaller ones succeed.

From the AP Article:

"When the smaller guys are gobbled up by bigger guys, in theory it's supposed to be better, but in our experience it's been worse," he says. "It's certainly not something that I'm really excited about. It has the potential to be a positive experience, but my experience has told me that more times than not, it's problematic."
Rob Ewing, senior vice president of systems and technology for InterCall, which sells conference-call services, says his company stopped buying new licenses from a provider of database software just six months after it was acquired. The main problem: The support staff was cut.
"Resolutions to issues went from less than a day to more …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

There's a lot of buzz on the Internet today about some "leaked" Microsoft slides concerning Windows 8. But, like the Computerworld article on the subject says, you shouldn't get excited about anything in those leaked slides. You're likely to end up disappointed. If any of you can remember back to 1994, when Windows 95 beta versions were out, there were some awesome options available that never made it into the operating system (OS). In fact, some of them have never made it into any Windows operating system.

Every new iteration of a Windows operating system brings out the wishers and "it's going to do this" types. Rarely do they ever come to fruition. That is unless you're talking about service packs, hotfixes and security alerts. Those you can predict with great accuracy.

If you want to know more about Windows 8 features, here's a list of "for sures."

  • Service Pack 1 due in 3 months from Release
  • Service Pack 2 due one year from Release
  • Service Pack 3 due 18 months from Release
  • Windows Updates requiring reboot every 9 days
  • Security fixes requiring reboot every 16 days
  • Freezes that require reboot every 51 days

And those are just a few of the "secret" and "leaked" features that are known at this time. Updates will be made as they're received by our secret and leaked news feed aggregators.

There's a bit of a Zeitgeist when it comes to operating systems. Some …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

Do you use Google's Chrome Browser? Apparently, a lot of people do. So many, in fact, that it has now passed Safari in the web browser popularity poll. Is this a big surprise to anyone? The article states that Chrome now has just under ten percent of the market share to Safari's four percent.

It isn't a surprise to those who use Chrome. Like other Google products, it's well made, stable, works on Linux, supports dozens of languages and is very fast. What's not to like?

The better question is who cares about browsers and the so called browser wars? What possible difference could it make to anyone which browser someone uses?

A lot of people seem to care, though.

Unless someone can figure out a way to monetize a particular browser, there doesn't seem to be any point to knowing which one someone uses. Having multiple popular browsers only complicates matter for web developers but doesn't really do much else.

Which browser do you use and why? Do you think it matters which browser someone uses?

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

There's big news in the software patent front from none other than The U.S. Supreme Court. In the case of Bilski vs. Kappos, handed down yesterday, is a major blow to the anti-patent movement, specifically the no software patent groups.

Florian Mueller, founder of the anti-software patents movement (NoSoftwarePatents) in Europe, provides the following commentary on the subject:

Yesterday's Supreme Court ruling in re Bilski was unfortunately a clear victory for those favoring an expansive patent system and the inflation that it entails. The two "inventors", Bernard L. Bilski and Rand Warsaw, saw their patent application thrown out, and that makes them the losers of the court proceeding, but few people will care about them now.

The big losers are:

  1. The free software and open source communities
  2. Software patent abolitionists
  3. Small and medium-sized companies who can't or don't want to play the patent game
  4. The proponents of bogus treatments: Linux Foundation, Open Invention Network etc.
  5. The Patent Absurdity movie
  6. Red Hat
  7. Google's foray into new markets (Android, WebM)
  8. Salesforce.com (Marc Benioff)
  9. The "captive court" theory
  10. IBM's open source credibility


You can read the entire entry by Mr. Mueller on his blog.

Florian Mueller is a software developer and government affairs professional. In 2004, Florian founded the NoSoftwarePatents campaign, which contributed to the European Parliament's rejection of a proposal for European software patent legislation. At the time, Florian was an adviser to, and small shareholder in, …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

Jim Whitehurst, Red Hat, Inc. CEO, believes that VMware is its biggest competition in the virtualization and cloud computing space. In a PCWorld article, Whitehurst stated Friday at the Red Hat Summit that "When you start thinking about who is defining cloud-based architectures, it's us and them [VMware]," he said. "We're the only two companies that have the components to really do cloud."
Whitehurst has possibly never heard of Ubuntu Linux and its cloud offering, UEC.

Whitehurst continued,

"Technically, it's a perfectly fine vision. Commercially, I worry about the lock-in and VMware defining the stack," he said.

Cloud computing favors open source, Whitehurst argued. "Modular layered architectures are built on open source," he said. He noted that the typical proprietary license models make it difficult to build a cloud, given the licensing and lock-in concerns. "Who in their right mind would roll out a 50,000 server environment locked into one vendor? If you buy ESX and three years later you get a renewal, how much will [VMware] charge you?"

It's true that cloud computing favors open source but further, it favors free software and it favors Ubuntu over Red Hat.

That's a powerful assertion but the logic behind it is solid. Red Hat no longer offers a "free" version of its software. For that, you have to use the community version, Fedora or another community version such as CentOS or Scientific Linux. …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

To get down and dirty in mobile phone competition, Nokia decides to take on Apple and Google by adopting the Linux MeeGo platform for its new N-Series phones. Back in February of this year, Intel and Nokia teamed up to create the MeeGo mobile phone platform.

This bold move allows Nokia to compete more effectively with Apple's iPhone and Google's Android-based phones. The MeeGo platform features rich applications via the blending of the Moblin Linux distribution and Linux-based Maemo.

Nokia realizes that the mobile space is competitive and Apple's iPhone has displaced Nokia's dominance in that space. Interestingly, this announcement comes on the same day as the release of the much anticipated Apple iPhone 4.


All About MeeGo

MeeGo is an open source, Linux project which brings together the Moblin project, headed up by Intel, and Maemo, by Nokia, into a single open source activity. MeeGo integrates the experience and skills of two significant development ecosystems, versed in communications and computing technologies. The MeeGo project believes these two pillars form the technical foundations for next generation platforms and usages in the mobile and device platforms space.

MeeGo includes:

  • Performance optimizations and features which enable rich computational and graphically oriented applications and connected services development.
  • No-compromise internet standards support delivering the best web experiences.
  • Easy to use, flexible and powerful UI/app development environment based on Qt.
  • Open source project organization managed by …
khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

Today, June 22, 2010, The Open Invention Network (OIN) announced that Canonical, the company that owns and produces the Ubuntu Linux distribution, joins its ranks as the first Associate Member.

Florian Mueller, founder and former director of the NoSoftwarePatents campaign and the founder of the FOSS Patents Blog had this to say about the announcement:

"The Canonical announcement once again shows the absolutely unacceptable degree of intransparency with which the Open Invention Network operates. Both the press release and the OIN's website fail to specify what exactly the rights and obligations of OIN Associate Members -- as compared to mere licensees -- are. Also, there's no information concerning the criteria according to which a company is eligible to become an OIN Associate Member. Canonical is known for being a strategic partner of IBM, and since IBM is the most influential force behind the OIN, that's probably the reason why its membership status was upgraded."

"The OIN can't claim to pursue the protection of the Linux ecosystem as long as its non-assertion commitment relates only to an arbitrary definition of what the OIN calls 'the Linux System', which includes some but not all of the major applications that are usually shipped with major Linux distributions. The OIN reserves the right to redefine 'the Linux System' and therefore the scope of its license agreement anytime at its sole discretion, which is intransparent and arbitrary and raises serious questions. It seems …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

I've decided that I'm not picking it up. No iPad for me.

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

My wife purchased the 32GB Apple iPad for my Father's Day gift. Fortunately, for me, you don't receive the iPad the day of purchase. Here's how it works: You buy the iPad, they send you an email when it arrives at the Apple Store, you have 24 hours to pick it up or you lose it. It might take three to five days to arrive at our local store. Thank goodness, because I'm having second thoughts about it.

If it arrived today, I wouldn't pick it up.

My reservations are numerous. I'm excited about the prospect of having it but I'm also a bit put off by the $800 or so that she spent on it. For $800, I could get the latest, high-end laptop or desktop system loaded with software. I'm having buyer's remorse. I'm considering telling her not to pick it up.

Sure, I can write about it and I can use it in place of a laptop for short periods of time but I just can't get past the price. At $400, I'd look to it with anticipation. But, at $800, with all of the bad and lukewarm reviews on Amazon.com, I just don't know. I'm also pretty sure that Apple doesn't have a return policy if you aren't satisfied.

I've never owned anything Apple and I have the jitters about it.

I used to support clients who used Apple computers but I never found them interesting or …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

Someone left a comment on one of my posts similar to, "Linux won't be popular on the Desktop until it runs Windows applications." To which I silently responded, "Huh? and, "You've got to be kidding me." We have WINE for running Windows applications and it works reasonably well for those who care to spend the time to work through any problems with it. I don't think the Linux Community needs to spend time on such an undertaking. Is anyone asking Apple to run Windows applications so that it will gain popularity? No? Then, why should Linux? If you want to run Windows applications, run them on Windows.

Linux is Linux. Mac OS is Mac OS. And, Windows is Windows.

Why does anyone want or need any crossover?

If application vendors want to create applications that run on Linux, that's great. I'm behind that 100 percent. If Intuit, for example, wants to create QuickBooks that runs on Linux, I'd buy it. If Adobe created Photoshop for Linux, they'd have an audience. And, if Microsoft created Microsoft Office for Linux, it would sell too. After all, the first operating system that MS Office ran on was the Mac OS.

And, why would you want to run Windows applications when we have OpenOffice.org, KOffice, GIMP and many others that are actually better than their Windows counterparts? They're so good that all three of …

rubberman commented: Yep! We have Linux and Apple systems in our house - no MS Cruft! +14
khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

Megaloft? I've never heard that one. I can't figure out what it means. And, for the record, I said it rhymes with Shmindows. I have school children. They just ignore me.

"Schmindows?" "Megaloft?"

OK, I'll join in. "Snapple?" No, that's taken. "AssHat?" No, I like RHEL. "GoodForYux?" No, it's more tragic than comic. "Supercalifragilisticexpialolaris?"

Jeez. There are school-children who would consider this stuff beneath their dignity.

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

Thanks Doc,

I guess my main point was to say that anything named with a suffix of "sux" typical means that you aren't particularly in favor of it. For example, if I start a website named say, www.fewtsux.com, would you think I was a fan or an opponent of Fewt?
Unless of course, "sux" doesn't mean what I think it means.

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

That's like Michael Jordan being a member of a Basketball Haters Group or Simon Wiesenthal being a member of the Nazi party. It doesn't make sense to me. So, perhaps it isn't my facts that are flawed but the logic of being fan of something and a member of a hate group of that thing. Odd. Very odd.

Interesting. I just so happen to be a proud member of Linsux. I use Linux on my desktop, I publish Linux how-tos, and I write open source software for Linux freely available to all.

"It's also awesome that these folks have so much free time on their hands that they aren't contributing to society by volunteering or creating something for the good of all. But, they sure love to criticize those who do."

What is awesome is that you wrote an article completely devoid of facts.

These inaccurate statements just make you yet another fanboi, just the uninformed zealot kind.

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

Is it true that, if you speak up for GNU/Linux on the Desktop, you get flamed? I just had a virtual conversation with someone who claims that this assertion is fact. I've never experienced this anti-Desktop Linux sentiment or maybe my memory has failed me. I don't think the Linux Community would take a stand against it. The Apple Community is too glazed over with iCrap to care what we do. But, there is one "community" that might take issue with Linux on the Desktop. Who could it be? I'm having a little trouble coming up with the name, though I think it rhymes with Shmindows.

But, can we, the Linux Community, really point fingers at Shmindows fanboys and not take a little blame ourselves? We, I'm sorry to say, are equally guilty.

The problem is that over zealous fans of anything tend to be inflammatory when it comes to their favorite whatever it is. And, on top of that, these zealots feel as if they must comment on anything related to that favorite thing--often to the detriment of the entire project that they themselves defend. Unfortunately, the Internet provides everyone a virtual spray can with which they must "tag" their opinions on every virtual wall they find in opposition to their own narrow viewpoints.

But, you have to ask the question, "Why come out so strongly against something that someone chooses to use just because you disagree?" If you don't believe that it happens, just check …

Fewt commented: Lacks facts. +0
khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

Funny you should mention this but I think I might have one of the gizmo's you're pining for.
http://www.partner.com.tw/product/default.asp?prober=86.

I want one. Send me one for review.

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

I know it sounds crazy but the Linux Desktop isn't dead, it's just pining. It's pining for the correct platform--a tablet computer. And, I'm not referring to some cheap imitation tablet that will merely satisfy a few observers and nerdlets who use Linux. I'm thinking of a tablet computer for hardcore Linux moguls. You know, the kind of Linux person who is so into Linux that he tries to carry an egg on his feet through the winter. The kind of Linux fan who carries a wallet-sized photo of Linus Torvalds in her wallet. Linux pines for a true tablet platform that will do Linux justice and vice versa. Does one exist? Not yet.

It's hard to admit that the Linux Community just doesn't have enough force behind it to create and support a Linux tablet.

Oh, I know that there are a few Linux "pads" out there and a few more in the works but none have the appeal of the Apple iPad. Who do we think we're fooling with the notion that there is a Linux-based product that could compete with the iPad?

Not me.

Don't fret. I'm not buying a damn iPad either. I just don't think I can justify $700+ on something that a) I wouldn't feel good about because it isn't Linux, b) I can't afford, c) will be obsolete in a year, and d) is Apple-based.

But, to the original point, the Linux Desktop needs its own …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

I love them. Keep posting and watch for a follow-up with your distros in it.

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

I've run across ten new Linux distributions inspired by current news stories. Some, of course, are better than others and a few just have no practical use or purpose whatsoever but still are worth a mention. These ten distributions are in no particular order of my preference or relevance. Maybe you've run across some of them too in your Internet travels.

1. Lohanix - This cute little gem is still not mature but it sure is fun to use. It has all the latest gadgetry and accessories to keep you occupied for minutes at a time. The best part of this distro is that it works well in or out of rehab facilities.

2. BPix - BPix doesn't work well under pressure nor is it good at real 'in-depth' work but its slick new interface is perfect for those offshore workers. This one should really clean up near the US coastline.

3. Googlix - A search-oriented desktop is the only way to describe this distro that brings you speed, agility and global accessibility with no Microsoft software in sight. Downloads of this inspiring operating system is blocked in some countries.

4. JoranvanderSlootix - A Dutch language distro that is a bit of a renegade among other "tamer" distributions. Young college women should stay clear of this distro at all costs. Seems to have a disappearing user base.

5. Onebuttonix - This one has taken its simplistic design features from another operating system with its oversimplified, …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

OK, you two, stop fighting. These little spats of yours are getting old. A rumor, heard yesterday, that Google is not going to use Windows internally in their company might be just that: rumor. And, a bad one at that. It's interesting to note that, while such a rumor stirs up thoughts of Google's own Chrome OS on a thousand desktops/laptops/netbooks; I don't know that it's entirely possible to toss out all the Windows operating systems from their midst. Or desirable.

FOSS Chorus: How can he say such a thing? He's the Linux Guy, after all.

I'm realistic. Not all of Google's customers will want or need to use Linux. Or Mac. Or even Windows. It just isn't wise for anyone to say that they will or will not use product X because of <insert lame excuse here>.

FOSS Chorus: OMG. Is he for real? How is it lame to say that Linux is more secure than Windows? And, Google should feel free to move to their operating system of choice--as long as that choice doesn't mean Windows.

Google has customers that use Windows. They have customers that use Mac. And, they have customers that use Solaris, AIX, HP-UX and Linux. To think that the world could be a world of one operating system is ridiculous. Besides, if we all used Linux, what would the zealots do with 99.99% of their time?

Oh yeah, I forgot. Video games.

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

@Basurero

You're right! Thanks. LOL. We need grammar Nazis, just not the other kind.

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

This Memorial Day weekend reminds us all of those who sacrificed their lives for freedom and to protect a way of life that is based on freedom. While considering the brave men and women who stood up for what is right over the past 250 years, it made me realize a similar thing about Linux. No one has given his life for Linux but certainly there have been sacrifices. But, like their armed soldier counterparts, it isn't about the sacrifice, it's the freedom you big dummy.

We have the freedom to choose the operating system we use on our computers. We have the freedom to choose the software that's installed in that operating system. We also have the freedom to say "No" to non-free software.

We have freedom.

It occurred to me that the people who sacrificed countless hours, talent and money to these free software projects weren't doing it for fame or fortune but to give all of us the freedom to choose. That's freedom.

I suspect that there are very few people who really want to die for a cause, regardless of their passion for it, but those sacrifices give the rest of the world a freedom that is beyond price. It's almost beyond comprehension.

I applaud and praise all those who've given of themselves for the good of us all. Thank you for our freedom. Thank you for your sacrifices. Thank you for our ability to choose. It is by standing on …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

This post is a summary of a conversation I had the other day with an acquaintance of mine. It started out with him asking me what I do for a living and ended up with me having to choke back tears of laughter. I hope you have the same reaction although I realize that it might be one of those, "You had to be there" moments.

Early Wednesday evening, I was walking around our neighborhood and looking at the pool that's opening this weekend, when I met up with a fellow whom I've met a few times. Our wives are pretty good friends and he and I have chatted over a beer but we're not that close. We were small talking when he asks me what I do for a living. I told him, "I'm a Consulting Engineer at a major technology company and I'm a technical writer."
He then asked me what I write about and I told him, Linux, open source, databases and occasionally some Windows stuff.

From this point on, I'll call him "Bob" and give you the conversation as clearly as I can remember it.

Bob: "Linux? You know about Linux?"

Ken: "Yes, I've worked with it for about 15 years now."

Bob: "Wow, that's great. I have a problem with mine."

Ken: "You use Linux?"

Bob: "Yeah, had it for years. It's giving me a little trouble now, though."

Ken: "Oh? Maybe I can help."

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

Time to enter the Wayback (WABAC) Machine to an experience I had with a new Linux user and compare it to today's more tech savvy audience. The year was 1997 and I had settled in for the evening with my favorite beverage and a bit of channel flipping, when I received a telephone call from a guy who'd installed Linux on his computer. He didn't know what else to do from there, except call someone who did know what to do, me. The conversation began with him saying, "I've installed Linux, now what?"

I was in business for myself, at the time, as a computer consultant. I, along with two of my friends, installed networks, repaired computers, setup servers and desktops and did end user support.

Evening calls were standard fare for me at the time and so I answered the ringing without hesitation. This one time, I wish I had ignored it. But, why should I have felt that way when Linux, then and now, is my favorite computer topic?

It was the kind of call that you only see in movies or read about on Dilbert.com. To say that this individual was thick-headed and belligerent is an understatement of the facts. But, he was both.

And, what's worse? I felt that I had to be nice to him and show him that Linux people are friendly, loving people who really want him to succeed at learning this awesome …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

I read a story this morning over at Infoworld.com that shocked me a bit. Neil McAllister discusses how proprietary software companies, like Microsoft, criticize open source projects by saying that, "They don't innovate, they copy." Is that really the consensus for an entire software realm that brought us the world wide web, TCP/IP, sendmail, DNS, DHCP, Perl, PHP, Apache, HTML and basically everything else that we use on the Internet today? Is that really the stance they want to take?

Neil also gives us seven major open source projects that are not knockoffs of Microsoft's knockoffs.

But, instead of focusing entirely on his article, I'd like to focus on the "missed it by a mile" target of companies, like Microsoft, that spout such nonsense.

As for knockoffs, who better than Microsoft to point that fickle finger?

I'm still shocked that IBM and Apple haven't sued the pants off of Microsoft for their obvious plagiarism of those companies' products and innovations.
From DOS to Windows to their GUI designs, icons, menus, .NET and program names, they (Microsoft) are the ones who play the knockoff card. And, they play it in spades.

Here is a list of Microsoft products and the originals:

  • Windows (The Name) - X Window
  • Windows - OS2 and Mac
  • Explorer Interface - Mac
  • MS Office - Lotus and Framework
  • SQL Server …
khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

That's what I used to ask about AOL.

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

I took those from my wife's laptop to be sure that it wasn't some anomaly on my system related to my cache or cookie.

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

That is disturbing. Thanks for the note.

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

More info here, Thanks, Yahoo, You Did the Right Thing.

with screenshots.

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

It looks like Yahoo has reinstated the Linux/Open Source link on their Tech News page. Perhaps it was just a fat-fingered mistake or an accident of some sort that the link was removed from the main link bar but it certainly raised my hackles. And, frankly, my hackles don't need raising over something like this. But, they've put it back in a different location (not a big deal) but at least they've put it back. And, for those of you who either believe that it never left or that my eyesight is somehow to blame, I have screen shots for you.

This is the screenshot on the day that I noticed the link missing. In its place is Social Media.

yahoo-no-los.png

Here is today's snapshot of the same page that includes Social Media and Linux/Open Source. I do wish that I had an original screen shot of the site but, really, who'd have expected something like this to happen? yahoo-los-returned.png

Whether the reinstatement was a result of my post, " Yahoo, What are You Thinking? " is of little importance. The real issue is that it's back. The post I was going to put up in response to this atrocity was, "Yahoo Loves Apple More Than Linux." And, in it, I was going to make multiple references to Mactards, one-button mice, Priuses (Prii?), sandals and rainbows. Plus the fact that Apple would be the only OS represented on …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

It wasn't there before when I posted this. Social Media replaced it. It's there now. Want to see my screenshot of it missing?

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

They've put it back! Yay! The pen, you see, is mightier than the sword. It used to be where Social Media is now. I have a screen shot to prove it wasn't there on the day I posted this. WOO HOO! May the Source be with you.

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

OK, I'm not sure what's going on in the minds of the geniuses over at Yahoo but just today they removed the Linux/Open Source link under News/Tech is gone. Its replacement? Social Media. Thanks Yahoo. That's really clever. NOT! In the realm of things dumb, that takes second place right under iPad early adopters. But that's OK. We still have lxer.com, linuxtoday.com and lwn.net where we can get our news. Thanks Yahoo, you helped us.

Yes, helped us.

You've helped those who're looking for legitimate Linux/Open Source news and not just your rollups of other site's articles and postings.

But, since you, yourselves, use open source and Linux for your own infrastructure, it's odd that you would take out that major link from your Tech site. I wonder how many monthly hits you'll lose because of that? I also wonder how long it will be until you re-instate the Linux/Open Source link under Tech.

That's OK. You know where to go for the latest news and commentary on Linux and open source topics, don't you? That's right, right here on DaniWeb.com.

You can do your part for the Linux/Open Source community by writing to the empty brains over at yahoo.com and inform them that they've made an egregious error. It's not like they couldn't add in another link to their otherwise lame Tech site. The other awesome (sarcasm) links under Tech are:

Tech Video …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

I saw a report that read, "Video game sales plunge in April." Software sales dropped by 22 percent and hardware sales dropped by 37 percent. What's the story, folks? Do you have all the gaming miscellanea that you can afford? Are you satisfied with your current array of video games? Are you using free games like the ones found in Linux? Wait, I know what it is, you're playing games off of MAME to regain your misspent youth and to try and regain the thrills you used to get when putting all those quarters into a console for three minutes of play.

It was the fourth largest decline in sales since September 2000.

So, what's up with that?

Is there an additional story here? If there is, tip me on it.

My guess is that, at some point, even avid gamer's deep pockets come up empty. After you have the 512MB video card, Quad-Core, 16GB RAM and 4TB of disk; what else do you need?

Do you need Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell: Conviction?

OK, so you aren't using MAME and you don't have a PC with enough horsepower to enjoy Conviction. You're opting for Zynga's Treasure Isle, Mafia Wars, Farmville or some of the other freebies on Facebook aren't you?

In case you're wondering, I don't play those games so don't ask me to be part of your Mafia team or Farmville whatever because I …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

I know but all I did was install Visio. Good grief. How hard is it to program a system that doesn't require a reboot after installing Visio?

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

I used to refer to Windows as "The Infinitely Rebooting OS" and it has improved some over earlier versions but today was a different story and reminded me of those thrilling days of yesteryear. My question is why, Windows, why? Why must I reboot when I install a desktop application? Why must I reboot again when that application receives an update? I have to reboot for patches, applications, updates and installing Internet Explorer's latest version. Come on, give me a break. There has to be an easier way.

I hear what you're saying, "There is an easier way, Ken, you can use Linux." Well, that is true in almost every case except where my employer is concerned. The company standard is Windows and I have to comply with that standard.

But, that really isn't the problem. The problem isn't what I use or that I use it. The problem is that it's ridiculous to reboot all the time. If the wind blows from the East, I have to reboot. If my wife sneezes, I have to reboot. If someone uses Windex, anywhere in the world, I have to reboot.

Why can't Microsoft fix this?

And, no, I don't believe it's a feature. It's a flaw.

I don't hate Windows. I don't hate Microsoft. They deserve to exist, to make a profit, to flourish but the product they deliver needs to be something more than just a thing I have to fix …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

A new version (9.0) of PostgreSQL is in beta and ready for public testing. If version 9.0 lives up to its proposed feature list, then it is serious competition for MySQL. PostgreSQL proponents have long suggested that PostgreSQL has always enjoyed superiority over MySQL. I beg to differ but that may be changing.

I tried using PostgreSQL several times over the past few years, beginning with version 6.x. I received it on CD for review. It was OK. Nothing thrilling or special. I did think it was an ambitious project but at the time, I didn't really care much for it.
I thought it was clunky, bloated and too complicated.

I tried again with a 7.x version. Same results.

Version 8.0 arrived with a bit of fanfare and I really tried this time. Not that I hadn't tried before but this time, I dedicated a whole Linux system to it. I was convinced that I was going to use PostgreSQL this time. I wanted to use it. For me, it was either Oracle or PostgreSQL and I couldn't afford Oracle. Still can't.

I gave PostgreSQL a good workout through attempting a setup of a web database application using Perl and PHP for the front end and automated back end. Again, PostgreSQL was too complex for me to use and therefore far too complex for many of my clients. I never felt comfortable enough with it to maintain my relationship with it.

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

Earlier this evening, I had a conversation with a friend and colleague in the IT business. He runs his own independent computer consulting firm and we were trading war stories about customers, hardware vendors and work sharing. Work sharing, also known as "farming out" work that you can't do yourself due to your schedule, volume or lack of expertise. He shocked me when he made the statement that, "Not that many companies use Unix anymore." Huh? I must have looked as if someone wanted to purchase my firstborn when he said that because he emphatically repeated the statement.

I took a large gulp of my iced tea and choked out the words, "Are you kidding me, what about bigger companies?"

"Nope," he replied, "even hospitals use all Windows on Dell systems."

My mouth was still agape at this and I had an odd clanging sound going off in my head.

I cleared my throat and said, "Oh sure, the workstations but they use Unix for their servers, right?"

Again, the reply was, "Nope, they use Windows on those too."

And then he named two local hospitals as examples.

OK. I like this guy. I think that he's probably a very good computer tech and I know that he treats people fairly but I'm afraid that he's terribly misinformed.

One of the hospitals that he mentioned, I know for sure uses Unix to do some of their dirty work …

hes8 commented: Today when people mention Unix, they usually really mean Linux. So there really isn't that much Unix use in 2020, but there is a lot of Linux use. +0
khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

Just when you thought it couldn't get any worse in the world of software patents, a reliable source sent me this response from Steve Jobs about a patent pool that's forming and aiming to nail the open source codecs projects. It's enough to make the weak at heart go weak in the knees and stop working on open source projects.

Here is Steve Jobs' response to the letter from Hugo Roy:

From: Steve Jobs
To: Hugo Roy
Subject: Re: Open letter to Steve Jobs: Thoughts on Flash
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 06:21:17 -0700
All video codecs are covered by patents. A patent pool is being assembled to go after Theora and other "open source" codecs now. Unfortunately, just because something is open source, it doesn't mean or guarantee that it doesn't infringe on others patents. An open standard is different from being royalty free or open source.

Sent from my iPad

Does this mean that patent holders are going to launch an all-out war on open source projects?

Yes. I'm afraid so.

Beware open source programmers. As snipers like to say, "If you see red, you're dead", which here means something along the lines of, "If Apple and other patent holders decide that you've infringed on their patents (whether you have or not), they'll stop your project and possibly seek damages (money) from you.

'Tis a sad day indeed for those open source projects.

'Tis sadder still …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

System Administrators (SAs) have a tough job: Dealing with users and user accounts, security, patching, updates, upgrades, disk space, performance and other miscellaneous tasks often known as "other duties as assigned." For some SAs, the day never ends. Despite the challenges, pitfalls and occasional irate user; system administration is a fulfilling job with intangible rewards like no other position in IT. To assist those weary SAs in their quest to conquer their Linux systems, I've devised this list of 12 native Linux system monitoring tools that are always at my fingertips.

Any user may issue these commands, if they exist and haven't been protected by the SA. They are harmless and are read-only commands. The only problem with them is that ordinary users might inform the SA of a performance problem before the SA knows about it and that can irritate an overworked SAs nervous system.

1. top - It's only fitting that at the top of this list, that you'd see 'top.' Top is a diagnostic tool and a real time monitoring tool. Execute this command to see a running list of the top system resource consuming processes on a system. Try it for yourself by typing top <ENTER> at the command prompt. To quit top, press the 'q' key.

top - 14:55:04 up 3 days, 20:49, 2 users, load average: 0.07, 0.05, 0.06
Tasks: 124 total, 1 running, 123 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.2%us, 0.8%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

Canonical's Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Server Edition features the ideal deployment platform for Linux server workloads and cloud computing Long-term support (LTS) version of popular server operating system generally available on 29 April.

LONDON, April 27, 2010: Canonical today announced the upcoming release of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Server Edition which includes extended security and maintenance updates free of charge to all users for five years (versus 18 months for a standard release). The third and latest LTS version of the popular Linux server distribution, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, delivers on the standing commitment to release a long term support version of Ubuntu every two years and builds on the success of Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, which has been a hugely popular deployment platform with Ubuntu enterprise users. Ubuntu 10.04 LTS will be available for free download on Thursday 29 April.

In addition to the stability of long-term support, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS extends the cloud-computing capability of Ubuntu Enterprise Cloud, powered by Eucalyptus - a technology that is becoming widely used as a basis for building private and hybrid clouds. Ubuntu 10.04 LTS also includes many major applications and packagesadded or updated since the previous LTS release, giving new and upgrading users an extended range of applications that can be easily installed at launch.

"IDC's models show Ubuntu accounting for 5 percent share of paid
subscriptions and nonpaid deployments of new copies of Linux worldwide in 2009. Underlying that number is a nonpaid share of nearly 6 percent, and a …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

It's rare that a company like Red Hat would remove a high-end feature from its popular commercial operating system but that's just what it did. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 6.0 will ship without the Xen hypervisor. Instead, it will include Red Hat's own KVM virtualization. Has Red Hat done itself a disservice with this move? Is it alienating an entire user base?

Absolutely not, to both questions.

After Red Hat purchased Qumranet in 2008 (and acquired KVM in the deal), it no longer needed to support a second, competing hypervisor. The people at Red Hat and Qumranet are smart enough to successfully convert a Xen user base into a KVM one. KVM and the SPICE protocol are not only a welcome entry into the Virtualization space, they might be the best answer for those seeking a full virtualization answer to VDI (Virtual Desktop Infrastructure).

I'm looking forward to seeing Red Hat 6.x for myself. We use RHEL extensively at my day job and are up to the latest current production versions there. We've all been impressed with performance and agility of the latest incarnations of this now classic Linux distribution and I'm betting that RHEL 6.0 won't disappoint us.

So, now when you're working on your motorcycle, be it actual or virtual, you'll have to do it without Xen but KVM will carry you through.

What do you think of Red Hat's decision to drop Xen?

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

I think you will need to use a CondPattern in that RewriteCond but not sure if it will work. The CondPattern takes on a perl syntax. So, if you can test it with a Perl test, you'll have it. Sorry, that I don't have more info on that. I've never heard of this type of need before.

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

Using a script or from within Apache?

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

Have you changed the config to reflect where your CentOS apache files are? Make sure all the config info is updated and you can stop and start apache from within Webmin.

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

The other day, when involved in a lengthy text-based chat session with a coworker, I realized (for the first time perhaps) that we need a smarter chat client. I spent a great deal of time and energy attempting to explain a relatively simple concept to my coworker, when it occurred to me that he couldn't understand the language exchange nor could he decipher the message I attempted to convey. Finally, I relieved our collective pain with the five words that were so difficult to extract from my fingers but were so willingly grasped by his mind: I'll take care of it.

I'm sure that he left the conversation with the same opinion of me that I had of him: Obstinate Fool.

The primary problem between us was language.

We both knew what we meant but we just couldn't convince each other of the accuracy of our respective comments. We weren't arguing, we were discussing a problem, but neither of us made the correct cognitive connections needed to comprehend what the other was saying.

The solution is a non-existent product called Babelian: The Universal Chat Client.

Here's how it works:

On my end, I type in English (A poor subset of American English) and he types in his nationally mandated language.

We each type in our native language and receive messages in our native language as well.

Explicitly, I type in English and receive his messages in English. He types in Russian and …

khess 95 Practically a Master Poster

Apparently, the besieged, McAfee antivirus-protected world saw little relief in the past 24 hours with McAfee engineers still scrambling to come forth with an answer. I guess the Executive VP, Barry McPherson, doesn't use his own product because he was able to post to his blog a couple of times yesterday--although he's been oddly silent today.

Sup, Barry? Cheap labor starting to affect your business?

Maybe it's time that we all reconsider the "cost savings" and promises of "just as good as" development.

Unrelated you say? Possibly. But, it's never happened before in the history of McAfee, so you tell me. OK, enough on that topic. Back to the issue at hand.

From my post, "Global McAfee Glitch..." yesterday, one reader asked, "What should I do now?" I told him to "Boot up in safe mode, remove McAfee and install Avast antivirus."

Will that solve the problem?

Yes.

Will it solve the problem long term?

Probably.

Why?

Because now, antivirus software developers will learn from this experience and create snapshots of critical operating system files, quarantine them, and restore them if they become damaged or changed.

What about Service Packs and other updates, you say?

Easy. The manufacturer of said operating system, Windows, will provide a "signature" for their files that antivirus programs can read that lists critical files, sizes, time and date stamps and other important information.

What …