....@suspicio - "Memory usage comparisons show static positions - not "performance drainage". As I said in my earlier post, idle stuff gets heaved out if there is insufficient physical RAM to hold everything in RAM, leaving the target application to run at normal performance."
Now this is where you have me a little confused. You refer to "static positions" & "idle". The stats I gave were in reference to Memory Usage, tallied in total by the Task Manager in the "Physical Memory" usage. Also, in relation to some of the heaviest hitters - media players, Firefox esp. - their memory usage is nothing further from static or idle. Now firstly, my understanding is that only "idle" processes will be heaved out of RAM, meaning if apps are chewing up the RAM, and are active not idle, then they won't be "heaved out" at all (without risk of crashing an app)... and there are only so many idle processes Windows can heave out to accommodate them. Secondly, if a x86 app is showing far more memory usage (both "working set" and "private working set") than a x64 equivalent, how does this not relate to usage of Physical Memory (or RAM)?? If system memory is being chewed up, does this not class as "resource drainage" as memory is part (not all, I know) of the core system resources?
I do come to computers primarily through a graphic/digital arts back-ground, so if this is one of those "black holes", do feel …
Suspishio 32 Posting Virtuoso Team Colleague
flaco commented: thank you man +3
sleepygamer commented: Great help! +3
Suspishio 32 Posting Virtuoso Team Colleague
thaner12000 commented: couldn't have done it without him +1
tuse commented: ty for your repy, cool nick! +2
Blog Dog commented: very helpful +1
gaurav_indian commented: thanks - gaurav_indian +1
explodinghead75 commented: good malware troubleshooting advice +2
kylethedarkn commented: Answer was quick and effective. Thanks +3
bigozone commented: thanks for your time and advice... +1
DarkRubicant commented: Smart and concise wording of the needs of the forum. +1
Omni commented: quick and insightful +4
Danarchy commented: Timely reply with good info. +4